Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Fructoids

Tim:

Thank you for the clarification, most is now clear. The subject matter of the two previous diagraphs, though formerly causing problematic inconclusiveness, has been brought to light by a mutual acquaintance. Though I deny ever sending aforementioned message about fructoids, I am in hearty agreement that the ensuing communications could indeed stimulate much clever discourse. With all amicability,

Allie

13 comments:

  1. Care should be taken to instruct the reader to start from the earliest post - another option would be to arrange these posts in reverse order...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree, but I don't know how to do that. Could you instruct me how this could be accomplished?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I intend to continue this discourse next monday; for now, I must continue preparing for my OCHEM and Cell tests.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh my...

    I must say, this is a very recondite blog. Perhaps I am not a meritorious reader, but I need more insight. Although thoroughly amused and intrigued by many of these posts, I fail to glean the connecting thread save the common peach theme. Flight of ideas? Or is this one of those un-fun games where you have to catch on?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Deepest regrets Kelsey,
    I unfortunately for you feel compelled to divulge to you that this is quite possibly what you call one of those "un-fun" so-to-speak "games" that you have to puzzle out. If one cannot draw her own dossier conclusively from the given evidence then, much must be done within her own pneuma to ascertain the true validity of her catechism. Averment is always admissable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just find it a waste of time and brain cells reading such things. Maybe if I wasn't a nursing student I could sacrifice and try to figure out this nonsense! lol Glad to see that you finally have a blog! Congrats. :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Someday I'll actually read your posts... probably... I'm sure they must be good!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Shama, why do you treat with such malice? I only intend goodness for my constituents.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I appreciate this blog immensly--just the right combination of apparently coherent and obviously inane to be extremely funny.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just peachy.

    However the casual observer may certainly conclude from the most recent declaration that enlightenment is most certainly not achieved through isolated ponderings. If thou dost not possess the benevolence to divulge, I shall endeavor seek the wisdom of mutual acquaintances to make sense of the apparent maunderings and exonerate my mind from the aforementioned "problematic inconclusiveness."

    Although on further research the apparently astute acquaintances fail to provide any reasonable interpretations. Perhaps the peach is not quite as well comprehended as earlier believed. Nevertheless, congenial consorts are thoroughly delighted by the amusements contained therein.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Comprehension would miss the point entirely. The point is the peach, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  12. so when can I write something in your blog?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I completely agree with Barry: comprehension would miss the point. I learned that very early on in my friendship with all things peachy. But then, each must learn for him or herself.

    ReplyDelete